Site menu:

Links:

SHTC
St. Helena
of the True Cross
Fr. Farfaglia's Parish
TLM
San Diego TLM
Holy Cross Chapel
Sunday
Low Mass: 7:30am
High Mass: 9:00am
Holy Days
As Announced
Meditations from Carmel EWTN, Global Catholic Network design new overall

Site search


Recent Comments

Categories

Archives

Contributors

Tim Dennebaum
Tim O'Brien
Fr. Farfaglia
Mike Apelo

The false Gospel of Sean Hannity

 

center index
[picture from Human Life International]

I watch a lot of Foxnews.com and I am a supporter of people like Bill O’Reilly and Sean Hannity on most of their political views.

That being said, I was deeply upset at Sean Hannity’s treatment of Fr. Euteneuer who appeared on Hannity and Colmes to confront Sean about his open endorsement of birth control. Not only was Mr. Hannity grossly disrespectful to a Catholic Priest, he was arrogant, ignorant, and completely out of line. The exchange between Mr. Hannity and Fr. Eutenauer clearly demonstrates he has not studied his faith in any real depth or much worse he willingly and openly dissents. If so, he can hardly be called a “Catholic”.

When cornered all Hannity could do was resort to the tired old, “stop-judging-me” bit. He was quick to pull out: “Judge not and you will not be judged.” from Luke chapter 6, verse 37. Sean would have done well to read these passages in context and maybe he wouldn’t have made himself a public fool. We know from Scripture that when “Judge not and you will not be judged” is taught, it does not mean that we cannot criticize or ‘judge’ a persons’ actions and beliefs to be objectively wrong or even objectively sinful. In fact to charitably admonish someone for their sin is a spiritual work of mercy! Sean definitely does not know his Faith and one can judge that with confidence.

Back to what the Bible means by judging. The Bible teaches that we cannot judge someone’s salvation. How do we know this? Take 1 Corinthians 4:5 for example: “Therefore judge nothing before the appointed time; wait till the Lord comes. He will bring to light what is hidden in darkness and will expose the motives of men’s hearts. At that time each will receive his praise from God.” This is clearly speaking of judgment and salvation. We are not to judge the salvation of men, for this is the work of Christ.

Then there is 1 Cor 5:9-12 which instructs us that we are to judge those within the Church. The commands given here by St. Paul require that we judge the actions of others for he tells us not to keep company with the immoral or greedy. How do we know those that are sexually immoral, greedy, and all the rest unless we judge them to be so? Here are the passages in question:

“I have written you in my letter not to associate with sexually immoral people— not at all meaning the people of this world who are immoral, or the greedy and swindlers, or idolaters. In that case you would have to leave this world. But now I am writing you that you must not associate with anyone who calls himself a brother but is sexually immoral or greedy, an idolater or a slanderer, a drunkard or a swindler. With such a man do not even eat. What business is it of mine to judge those outside the church? Are you not to judge those inside? God will judge those outside. Expel the wicked man from among you.”

One can go on and on with Bible verses about judging. Either way, it was very clear that this was just a tactic of Mr. Hannity in order to try to divert attention from his sin and attack Father.

Here is the text of the discussion between Mr. Hannity and Fr. Euteneuer. I have added my comments in red.

Colmes: Last Friday, Sean, my friend and partner here took a moment on his radio show to apologize — not for yelling at me the night before — which is what he should have done, but for eating meat during lent. But its not quite the apology that the president of the Human Life International Reverend Thomas Euteneuer wanted. He says that if Sean is seeking penance it should be for his stance on birth control rather than inadvertently eating meat. joining us now is the president of human life international Rev. Thomas Euteneuer. Reverend thanks for being with us tell me what happened and what your issue is with Mr.. Hannity here.

Fr. Euteneuer: Well, the point of the matter is I thought that Sean was doing a little bit of entertainment with the “eating meat on Friday” issue and the real weightier, or should I say the meatier matters of our Faith, he’s wrong on. So he shouldn’t be presenting these kinds of things as entertainment and then neglecting the core truths of our Faith and being in public dissent… (inaudible) …that’s intolerable.

Colmes: Let me ask you this, well known people like Sean who are Catholic and in the public eye… Should they be using their platform, necessarily, to preach the tenets of Catholicism when they are in the media. Is that something that one is obliged to do?

Fr. Euteneuer: No. One is not obliged to do that at all. One is simply obliged not to be a heretic in public. That’s the point. If he doesn’t agree with his Church on that matter he should not be pronouncing on the matter as if he was the authority on that matter. He’s not.

Hannity: Reverend. Let me, let me just say… You call me a hypocrite. You question the depth of my faith. Do you know anything about me and my religious beliefs? And my background religion? do you know anything about me?

[Sean, all Father needs to know is what the Church teaches and what you publicly profess. We know that you support artificial birth control and we know the constant teaching of the Church is that artificial birth control is gravely immoral. You claim that you are Catholic, yet your profession of artificial birth control is against Church teaching. Enough said.]

Fr. Euteneuer: I only see the evidence Sean. I see the evidence of a superficial presentation of one aspect of the faith. I see the… (inaudible)

Hannity: Judge not lest you be judged, Reverend. Maybe you ought to spend a little more time that our Church covered up one of the worst sex scandals and I wasn’t involved in it. And the fact that public people after that are willing to still be Catholic is something you should be applauding. Considering the levels of corruption at the highest levels of the Church was frankly embarrassing to every person

Here is Mr. Hannity pulling out the old “don’t judge me” card in order to make Father the ‘bad guy’ for “judging” him. This is the same strategy many homosexuals use when it is pointed out that homosexual acts are intrinsically disordered. Clever, but not that clever and unoriginal.

Hannity further tries to deflect attention from himself by attacking the Catholic Church. He states that Fr. Euteneuer should be applauding those that stayed in the Church after the scandal. Hannity fails to realize that our hope is in God and not in man. Anyone who leaves the Church due to the failing of any percentage of the hierarchy simply do not know their faith. We are in the Church for one reason and one reason alone: truth. Jesus Christ founded the Catholic Church on the solid rock of Peter. No amount of human sin can take that away from us. Christ will always be present for us in the Eucharist and His grace in the Sacraments. God will be with the Church always, according to His promises.

Rather, Sean, you should be applauding Priests like Fr. Euteneuer who have the guts to publicly stand up for the Christ’s teachings uncompromisingly.

Fr. Euteneuer: Sean I’m just asking you for basic honesty. If you are a member of this Church you profess what the Church believes, if you don’t believe it don’t say anything about it in the public forum and scandalize people, that’s all.

Hannity: You want to ostracize me? You want to excommunicate me? Do you know that I went to a seminary? Do you know that I studied Latin? Do you know that I studied theology? Do you know anything about my background? Anything at all, sir?

What point are you making here, Sean? Are you trying to say you know your Faith well because you went to seminary? Apparently your study of theology was superficial just as Father Euteneuer said. Your beliefs are not the beliefs and teachings of the Catholic Church. Your public stances are against the constant teaching of the Magisterium, the Popes, the early Church Fathers, and Scripture. Or are you claiming you know better?

Fr. Euteneuer: Its, its not apparent, Sean.

Hannity: Oh, so I’m not a good enough Catholic for you? I’m not a good enough Christian for you?

This is not the point Sean. Father has an obligation to preach, teach, and defend the Faith. He is attempting to point out and correct your sin. And in doing so, he is doing you a favor.

Fr. Euteneuer: No, that’s not the point. If you want to pronounce on Church issues…

Hannity: Judge not lest you be judged Father… the Good Book says that.

Yes, please understand the meaning of the passage you quote. The Jesus, the Apostles and many Saints have judged the actions and beliefs of others to be in error. And in doing so, they have kept the teachings of Christ. For it is a work of mercy to instruct the ignorant.

Father Euteneuer: Okay, well, the point of the matter is that you are a person in the public. If you’re in the public you are going to be criticized for your public views. Okay, you express them and I have the right to criticize them if you are professing you’re Catholic.

Hannity: You specifically took my position on birth control. One of the differences perhaps between you and myself is that I recognize that not everybody else in the world is Catholic and for someone who is deeply, profoundly a believer in life and doesn’t want to see abortion. Understanding that are self control issues for all in society, understanding that people don’t share the Catholic faith. I support that people outside the Church… I would rather… would you not rather they use birth control than abortion, sir?

Fr. Euteneuer: Sean, I just want you to be honest. I just want you to be honest

Hannity: No, no, no, answer that question. Would you rather people that are not in the Catholic Church use birth control rather than have abortion. That’s a simple question.

It is not “either or”, it is “both and”. We should rather wish that people would cease both birth control and abortion.

Fr. Euteneuer: I want people to use self control and you could be preaching that but you’re not.

Hannity: And if they won’t? Well, sir, I say it all the time: I teach my kids not to have sex before their married. That’s my moral job as a parent. But I’m saying for those who don’t share your religious faith: would you rather they use birth control or have abortions? Cause that’s the reality, Father. And if you don’t see that you’re not facing reality.

Fr. Euteneuer: That’s not the reality, Sean. Because birth control leads to abortion.

Hannity: It absolutely is the reality. How many abortions have had legal in this country since Roe V. Wade, sir? Millions of them.

Fr. Euteneuer: 47 million.

Hannity: That’s right

Fr. Euteneuer: But Sean, 60% of women going into abortion clinics are doing it because their birth control failed. So how good is birth control helping to stop abortion?

Hannity: Actually if you want to get technical here the Catholic Church does support a form of birth control, a natural method of birth control, is that not correct sir?

Fr. Euteneuer: Its not birth control Sean, its natural birth regulation and its open to life.

Hannity: Its the same thing, its the same thing to prevent pregnancy, isn’t that true sir?

It is not the same thing. It is as different as anorexia is from dieting. Furthermore, NFP can only be used for a just reason, not simply because a Catholic couple does not want to have a baby.

Fr. Euteneuer: No, that, that… again, I go back to my original point of the depth of your understanding of the issues you’re a cultural Catholic.

Hannity: You know what I’m going to say this. I don’t really care that you’re judging me Father. I really don’t care. But I’m going to tell you this: You know what? With what you’re doing here you are doing more to chase people away from the Church. And I would suggest to you Father, why don’t you work on real important issues instead of superfluous issues? If I eat meat on Friday or you want to call a public figure who is a devout Catholic a hypocrite. Why don’t you work on the corruption in the Church? Why don’t you work on the sex scandal? Why don’t work a change in the attitude that contributed to the atmosphere that allowed a level of corruption that frankly is absolutely morally beyond anything I ever seen in my life for any Church? Why don’t you work on real important issues, sir?

A devout Catholic does not go against Church teaching. You are not a devout Catholic, Sean.

Fr. Euteneuer: I agree with you and how do you know I’m not working on those?

Hannity: What are you doing? I haven’t read an article about that. Have you ever written an article about that instead of taking cheap shots at people that are publicly Catholic?

Hardly a cheap shot Sean. Fr. Euteneuer went on your show and played by your rules to confront you face to face. Again, you are not publicly Catholic, you pubicly claim to be Cathoic while going against the teachings of Christ’s Church.

Fr. Euteneuer: Yeah, go to my web site: Hli.org and you’ll see a lot of criticism of these issues. I’m criticizing you because you’re not consistent. You’re professing to be a Catholic and you are not.

Hannity: And I’m criticizing you… Are you perfect Father? Are you perfect in every way? Have you not sinned? “Ye who is without sin cast the first stone”, I think I read that some where.

Sean, there is a difference from claiming to be perfect and willingly and stubbornly dissenting from Church teaching. While Father Euteneuer is a sinner, you refuse to submit to the teachings of Christ and his Church. A major difference.

Colmes: You guys need a Jew to break this up. But let me ask you this: Would Hannity be welcome at your Church?

Fr. Euteneuer: Sean just be happy I’m not calling you a devil like the other guy…

Hannity: It’s been a heck of night, I gotta tell you.

Colmes: Would Hannity be welcome at your Church, Father?

Fr. Euteneuer:
Well, if renounced his belief in birth control and stop professing it publicly.

Hannity: Wait, would you deny me communion?

Fr. Euteneuer: I would.

Hannity: Wow, wow.

Watch the video here

Comments: 50

Comments

Comment from Lonevoice
Time: March 10, 2007, 3:39 am

We need morer Holy priests like this that are willing to say what needs to be said and teach the Truth of our Church!!!!!

Like Tim said above, ordinarily I agree with most of what Sean has to say about politics, but he is, IMHO, VERY poorly catechised.

Comment from Lonevoice
Time: March 10, 2007, 3:41 am

*More, not morer. Sheesh, it’s way to early to get up….5:40 here….

Comment from David
Time: March 10, 2007, 4:15 am

Sean Hannity’s publicly scandalous opinions about catholic teachings and gross disrespect to Catholic authority fuels anti-Catholicism. Why doesn’t the Catholic League make a public comment condemning Mr. Hannity’s attitude toward the Catholic faith as they do with other public figures?

Please contact the Catholic League and ask them to do their job or stop supporting them.

Comment from Carson
Time: March 10, 2007, 6:14 am

I sometimes listen to Hannity. I do like conservative talk radio but Hannity has always seemed to me to be a lightweight and a blowhard. His shameful and heretical claims, his limp defensiveness, and his disrespectful treatment of Father are beyond the pale but not that much different from much of his programs. I’ll listen to something else from now on.

CDL

Comment from Joe in Seattle
Time: March 10, 2007, 9:18 am

Sean Hannity is wrong, but I think we need to be ‘patient with those in error’, like that spiritual work of mercy says. He’s been corrected, and we need to make that stick, no doubt about that…

But Hannity does believe in the Catholic Church at some level.

Of course, he needs to know that if you believe in the Catholic Church, then you submit to her instruction on moral issues…

But the (possibly) positive thing I see from this is that Sean Hannity is standing up and saying what many errant Catholics who attend Mass believe as well. It might be a kind of teaching opportunity. Let’s not get bogged down bashing Sean Hannity too much. First we call forth as much charity into our hearts as we can while we pray for him. And then maybe this is an opportunity for US to learn some clearer calmer ways to present the morality of this issue for the many other Sean Hannity’s out there, in our families and social circles (parishes?), who may be church-going Catholics, but who just sincerely don’t think birth control is wrong, or if they accept the Church’s teaching, don’t understand why it is, and so as a result cannot explain or defend the teaching well when called upon to do so.

Comment from Helen Shinavar
Time: March 10, 2007, 11:01 am

Although I watch Sean and Alan every nite, I cringe at some of their outlandish beliefs. Sean, indeed, is a very poor example of the Catholic faith. He tries so hard to defend his arrogance and position by attacking Father and patting himself on the back for seminary training, etc. I think he missed a few lessons! I will pray that he will become the Catholic Christian he claims to be.

Comment from DD
Time: March 10, 2007, 11:02 am

Pray for Sean’s conversion. He’s in a great position and can be a great example to everyone.

God Bless Father E!

Comment from R. Longstreth
Time: March 10, 2007, 4:14 pm

As a fan of Hannity (on most issues), I have to step back on this one. I am somewhat shocked over his behavior toward Fr. Euteneuer. He was completely disrespectful and so juvenile in his argument that it made him seem like an idiot. Obviously, Hannity is far from perfect but I had never expected that he could be so off base on such an easy issue as this. I think that I will have to pay closer attention to what spews from between his lips in the future. If he can get this one so wrong, how much easier would it be to get the more difficult issues in the world wrong?

Comment from Mike
Time: March 10, 2007, 5:53 pm

I like Sean Hannity but Thank God Father Euteneuer! What irked me is Sean stated isn’t it better to use birth control so abortions will be reduced. This really got me mad. Fr. Euteneur should have told Sean hormonal birth control is abortifacient in nature. These abortions through the use of birth control are called chemical abortions. There are an estimated 14 million chemical abortions per year in the U.S.

http://www.prolifewisconsin.org/info…how.asp?lID=28

http://all.org/article.php?id=10217&… 333c239f77391

Then Sean calls NFP birth control. You think he would know the difference between birth control and NFP…

http://www.ewtn.com/vexperts/showmes…?number=441428

Do you think Sean has ever read Genesis 38 8-10? I think Father Euteneuer needs to explain this passage to Sean.

http://www.usccb.org/nab/bible/genesis/genesis38.htm

——–

Seans show only allows 5 minutes of discussion. This is a topic which takes a very long time to understand and therefore I knew nothing would be achieved during Sean’s program. I am just glad a priest finally called Sean out about this finally!

I pray Fr. Euteneuer can get together with Sean and explain what and why are faith teaches on contraception, birth control and NFP. I just don’t think Sean really has put much time into understanding this. Just my thoughts.

Comment from Diana Creedon
Time: March 10, 2007, 6:45 pm

I’ve welcomed Hannity’s conservative stand on many issues. When interviewing Father Euteneuer, Sean inferred that he himself is “a public figure who is a ‘devout Catholic’” - a term that strikes fear in my heart.

As a Canadian, I’ve watched our federal government usher in pro-gay marriage, pro-abortion legislation & much legislation corrosive to family life. This, under the aegis of high-ranking politicians, touted as “devout Catholic” leaders. The late “devout Catholic” prime minister (Trudeau) was buried with great pomp & ceremony in Montreal’s Notre Dame Cathedral with Father Jean-Guy Dubuc calling his a “rigorous, radical, fundamental faith.” Therefore publicly acclaimed “devout Catholics” scare me since Vatican II.

As a Roman Catholic, I staunchly defend the tenets of the Church. It was a joy to hear Father Euteneuer say what must be said. Beleaguered faithful traditionalists need to hear this.

Comment from hogerman
Time: March 10, 2007, 7:18 pm

Hannity’s behavior towards Fr. Euteneuer was shocking. He’s lost atleast one fan. I’ll no longer what this shows.

Comment from Christine O.
Time: March 10, 2007, 10:22 pm

How he tries to trap Father by asking “would you rather people use birth control? Or have abortions?” makes him look like such a fool. In the case of birth control by pills there is NO difference between the two! Both inhumanely prevent/end the life of an innocent human being inside the womb.

And yes, there IS a difference between Natural Family Planning and regular birth control. NFP spaces the birth of children using natural methods (cycle regulation through temperature taking, cervical mucus patterns and changes, abstinence, etc.) and remains OPEN TO LIFE (very important!!). It is a natural method that doesn’t artificially prevent life from forming in the mother’s womb, unlike birth control pills.

Sean Hannity should really do his research before spewing nonsense on nationwide television and causing scandal.

Thanks for the article, by the way.

Comment from John D07
Time: March 10, 2007, 10:38 pm

Man, oh man. This is the end of the Hannity and Colmes for me. Sean Hannity is not concerned with the truth and he is not concerned with good debate. His only concern was with WINNING the argument at all costs.

His arguments were full of holes; he was only trying to turn the attack on Father and the Church to get the heat off of himself. That much was very obvious.

There is no way he can defend his position in light of Church teaching, he twists scripture in an attempt to attack Father, and pats himself on the back for his apparent theological study and seminary training. Sadly, seminary training can mean nothing these days depending on what seminary he went to.

The seminary was blessed in that its name was not mentioned. This would have been a great embarrassment for them.

Comment from Mike
Time: March 11, 2007, 8:41 am

Here’s the difference between NFP (Responsible Parenthood) and Contraception…

Natural Family Planning is the knowledge of a couple’s fertility. It is a knowledge base about a couple’s ability to conceive a child.

The application of this knowledge in a particular marriage is called responsible parenthood. The couple either decides to try to achieve a pregnancy or to avoid by timing their use of the privileges of marriage according to the knowledge of their mutual fertility. (The man, if healthy, is fertile all the time. The woman, if healthy, is fertile about three or four days a month.)

Responsible parenthood differs from contraception in two ways: 1. There is no alteration of the bodies of either the husband or wife and this is a huge difference. 2. When the couple uses the privileges of marriage, they are not holding back at all or refusing to give everything they are, physically and spiritually. If they are infertile at the time, this is the result of the way God created them. They are giving themselves totally to one another AS THEY ARE AT THAT MOMENT. No one could require more. Further, God never asked couples to use the privileges of marriage at any particular time. That decision is completely theirs. So, in the marital act during an infertile period, husband and wife who are applying the knowledge of their fertility (NFP) responsibly (responsible parenthood) are giving everything they are at that moment to one another.

The intention is also different. The NFP couple realizes that in every marital union there is a chance (perhaps remote) of conceiving a child and they accept this possibility. The contracepting couple (even if only with condoms) has a positive intention against conception.

An example might help: I want some money from a bank. It makes a huge difference whether I go to the bank and draw the money out from a checking account or whether I approach a teller with a gun and “withdraw” $100. Either way, I get the $100, but one act is radically different from the other.

—-

Also just to note those practicing contraception have a 50% divorce rate. Those using NFP have a 0-4% divorce rate.

Why do NFP Couples Have Such Low Divorce Rates?

http://www.pureloveclub.com/chastity/index.php?id=7&cat=Birth+Control&entryid=121

Mike

Comment from admin
Time: March 11, 2007, 9:01 am

Thanks Mike. Might I add that also the Church teaches that NFP can only be used for grave reasons. This can constitute a difference between NFP and the contraceptive mentality.

Thanks for your input it is very helpful and informative!

God Bless.

Comment from kristin
Time: March 11, 2007, 10:45 am

I had mixed feelings about this debate. First and foremost, I must admit that I am a Sean Hannity fan and watch his show on Fox regularly. Although I have never met the man personally, I believe he is a sincere man with a strong moral compass who is searching for the truth. I will never forget the way he courageously gave the Schindler family air time as he did everything in his journalistic power to save Terri’s life. He may not be a 100% devout Catholic, but he is one of the few voices of sanity amidst the leftist media frenzy. However, on the other hand, I also recognize that Fr. Euteneuer has been commissioned by the Church to teach and proclaim the Church’s teaching on human life, which includes the Church’s rather unpopular stance on artificial contraception. But should we, the pro-life community publicly chastise a media personality who has been traditionally sympathetic to our cause? While I whole-heartily agree with the good priest in theory, I disagree with his approach in dealing with Sean. During the segment, Fr. E stated that Sean’s faith was superficial, that he was mere “cultural Catholic” whose faith lacked substance. While this appears to be true based on some of Sean’s comments, I feel to accuse an individual publicly of this is uncharitable, because only God can judge a man sincerity. I believe that the “dialogue” between these men would have been more fruitful they had tackled JPII’s Theology of the Body privately, perhaps over a beer or two. Not only would they have not been limited to the 7 minute segment, but the Sean would probably have been less defensive and more open to hearing what Father had to say. If we look at scripture, whenever Jesus admonished sinners he always tried to build a relationship with them first. Think about the woman at the well, for example. We are called to correct our brother, yes, but we are called to do it with gentleness and love, not condemnation. There are many people in the same boat as Sean—good people who attend Church every Sunday who either do not fully understand the reason behind the Church’s view on contraception, or are ignorant of the teaching all together. I have no doubt that the Holy Spirit is working through and on Sean Hannity. We should not give up on him, but rather encourage him and pray that the Lord will enlighten his heart to fully embrace the Church’s beautiful teaching on human sexuality.

Comment from krystal
Time: March 11, 2007, 12:19 pm

Seems like it’s a good thing Mr. Hannity went into journalism instead of into the priesthood! Maybe some theology students really were not taught properly on Natural Family Planning. Geez, he was awfully rude to the good priest.

Comment from admin
Time: March 11, 2007, 1:12 pm

Kristin:

Thanks for the comment. I agree with you that Mr. Hannity has done lots of good for the conservative political cause and does much good for American society.

However, I don’t think this issue can be overlooked. I believe that Father Euteneuer did a superb job in his defense of the truth. His admonishing of Mr. Hannity in the public forum I believe was proportional to Mr. Hannity’s promotion of birth control in the public forum.

I have a hard time believing that a man of Mr. Hannity’s intelligence does not know what the Church teaches on birth control. He obviously does know what the Church teaches and he obviously publicly dissents from it. How is it uncharitable to call him out publicly on that dissent? He apparently isn’t ashamed of his stance.

What Mr. Hannity is doing is scandalizing many Catholics and this calls for public correction. Catholics out there need to know that he is out of line and the Church is doing something about it. I believe Fr. Euteneuer was very, very charitable and Sean Hannity was the one who was overly defensive and nasty to a Priest.

Looking at Scripture we see that Jesus has publicly accused people of being hypocrites and white washed tombs. In the cases he has done so, it has been public figures who should’ve known better (i.e. the Pharisees).

Thanks again for your comment Kristin!

God Bless.

Comment from kristin
Time: March 11, 2007, 2:30 pm

I think Fr. E should have started out by saying that he has done much good for the pro-life cause and we are grateful for that…then challenge him to reconsider his stance on BC. What exactly did Sean say about artificial BC and in what context? I watch him almost every day and never heard him mention it.

Comment from marie
Time: March 11, 2007, 3:04 pm

Comment from admin
“Thanks Mike. Might I add that also the Church teaches that NFP can only be used for grave reasons.”

I have been through NFP classes at two different hospitals in different states. I had instructors, books and other info. and I do not ever recall that NFP can only be used for grave reasons.

Like Hannity said that NFP is a form of birth control or as the priest said “regulating”..same diff.

The priest should never made this a public issue with Hannity in the first place. If the priest is on an agenda then he should have gone against those like Kerry, Kennedy for their public support of abortion. That is a worse crime than birth control in which it greatly reduces the chances of babies being aborted.

I think everyone here who thinks that Hannity is a “heretic” needs to pull the logs out of your own eyes and let God judge him.

Comment from dee
Time: March 11, 2007, 6:39 pm

You failed to mention that the Father said: At least I didn’t call you the devil like the last guest did. Why did you leave that out? Oh is it because you don’t want your “HOLY” father Euteneuer to look bad? Face it the Father was just as rude to Hannity

Comment from strow9
Time: March 11, 2007, 7:19 pm

dee: For the record, lets say you’re right and Fr E was just as rude (I don’t agree with that, however)…but let’s say he was. SO WHAT!!! That’s not the issue. The issue is Hannity is openly preaching his beliefs which do not agree with the Church. Hannity is taking hertical positions.

Comment from admin
Time: March 11, 2007, 8:32 pm

Dee:
No, that was an honest mistake… thanks for posting about that quote. I will be sure to add it as soon as I am done with this comment. Also, I included the link to the video, anyone could’ve seen it for themselves.

However, I don’t view that as being rude at all… I don’t understand how it is.

Also, he was not even close to as rude as Sean Hannity was. If can see how you can come to that conclusion.

Comment from admin
Time: March 11, 2007, 8:39 pm

Dee:
Also, you imply that the inclusion of a SINGLE quote would all of a sudden make Fr. Euteneuer look just as bad as Hannity who probably had a DOZEN out of line quotes an a condescending tone.

Anyway, again, that was an honest mistake and it is being added. I still fail to see how that was a rude remark. The demeanor and tone of the two men were in no way alike.

Comment from kristin
Time: March 12, 2007, 3:44 am

I’m not excusing Sean’s behavior towards the priest, but I was once your typical “Sunday Catholic” and I thought I was rather devout too. If a priest came up to me who I did not know and called me a heretic and said my faith was superficial, I probably would have went on the defensive too. Fr. E. being the more “enlightened” one should have used a more pastoral approach when dealing with Sean, since he knows he is a hot head. But you’re also right that Sean should have remained calm, and stuck to the issue instead of diverting attention away from himself and the issue.

Comment from admin
Time: March 12, 2007, 7:42 am

Kristin:
I agree with you in that maybe Fr. Euteneuer should have pointed out the good Sean has done as well before going admonishing him for his stance on BC. This perhaps would have been a better approach.

Also, I can understand getting a little “defensive” if you are put on the spot. But not THAT nasty. Plus, Sean knew what he was getting into, he was the one that invited Fr. Euteneuer to the show and it was because of what Sean had seen Fr. Euteneuer say about him in print.

Comment from mary
Time: March 12, 2007, 8:21 am

I agree with Kristin that Sean might have been open to Fr. Eutenauer’s point if they had discussed the issue in private. I watch Hannity and Colmes regularly and had not heard his views on birth control before. I have, however, heard Catholic politicians speak about “a woman’s right to choose” and think more should be said about that.

Comment from kristin
Time: March 12, 2007, 8:31 am

I read his blog post and I thought his post was rather harsh too. He did not priase Sean for the good he has done, and just painted him out to be a “bad Catholic” again, probably without trying to speak to him privately first. It would help if I knew exactly what Hannity said about BC and it what context. But I’m not sure if Fr. E was justified in calling Sean a hypocrite. Sean is a conservative political commentator, not a Catholic priest or speaker. His show is not meant to be the next “Mother Angelica live” his place is in the secular arena. Maybe some people do, but I certainly don’t look up to him as an expert in Catholic matters, I just enjoy his perspective. And, as a sister of a brain damaged individual I will be forever grateful for the way he tried to help Terri Schiavo.

Comment from ken
Time: March 12, 2007, 9:44 am

I’ve cringed more than once in the past as I listened to Hannity on the radio say that he’s “okay with birth control”. So,for Hannity, an observant Catholic, eating meat on a Friday in Lent is a transgression against his Faith but his public dissent from the Church’s teaching on birth control is not? Father E’s calling him on this was far kinder than any of the daily recorded comments
Sean’s radio listeners make about him on his “Hate Hannity Hot Line.” Sean is “street” smart, so perhaps this burr- under-the-saddle dust-up with Fr. E. will motivate him to become more “pew” smart and further study and embrace his Faith’s moral teachings. I admire Sean for the good he’s done on many fronts…especially for our servicemen and women and their families. Keep Sean in your prayers. As Bill Bennett regularly quotes “All saints have a past, all sinners have a future.”

Comment from kristin
Time: March 12, 2007, 2:04 pm

Fr. E also made two theological mistakes when debating Sean. First, in a response to Alan Colmes question “Would he (Sean) be welcome in your Church?” Fr. E. began to say “not unless he repents…” Everyone is welcome at Catholic mass regardless of the state of their soul or their religious affiliation. It is the communion question that is an issue. And he also said Sean claims to be Catholic but b/c of his b/c control stance he is not. Actually, that is not true, once you are baptised Catholic you are forever marked, you will ALWAYS be Catholic even if you leave the Church, join another Church, or fall into a lifestyle of grave sin. You may not be in full communion in the Church, but once a Catholic always a Catholic.

Comment from Mike
Time: March 12, 2007, 6:07 pm

Fr. Tom Euteneuer just made these comments in regards to the interview on his blog…

http://spirit-and-life.blogspot.com/2007/03/hannity-liberal.html

Mike

Comment from Mike
Time: March 12, 2007, 6:27 pm

I am a big fan of Fr. Euteneuer. I remember about 6 months ago when he sent this terrific letter to Melinda Gates…

Dear Mrs. Gates:

For many years the world has paid close attention to the foundation that bears your name. No one faults you or your husband for funding excellent programs to keep kids in school and assisting with the advancement of healthcare for the Third World, but the real concern of people of faith has been how the Gateses will use their money when it comes to fighting AIDS, something your husband has called “Public Enemy #1.”

If there had been any doubt about it up to this point, your recent address to the 16th World Conference on AIDS in Toronto settled that question. You are using your high-profile position and extreme wealth to push condoms as a solution to this deadly disease, and that, quite frankly, is irresponsible.

For the moment, we’ll overlook the fact that your opinion is clearly at odds with the defined teaching of your own Church, and we’ll focus on the latex “solution” to AIDS from a purely pragmatic point of view. If you are so sure of your position then please show us any actual success of the condom as a solution to the AIDS pandemic in the last quarter century — any. The tidal wave of ideological rhetoric delivered at the World AIDS Conference does not constitute real proof that condoms have worked to stop the spread of AIDS. In fact, all the evidence is against you.

MUST READ ENTIRE LETTER: MORE…

http://www.catholicexchange.com/vm/i…1&art_id=34228

Mike

Comment from Mike
Time: March 12, 2007, 6:39 pm

Sorry the initial link I gave to you for Fr. E’s letter to Melinda Gates is no longer there. Here is a good link…

http://www.hli.org/sl_2006-08-25.html

Mike

Comment from admin
Time: March 12, 2007, 7:52 pm

Kristin, you said:

“And he also said Sean claims to be Catholic but b/c of his b/c control stance he is not. Actually, that is not true, once you are baptised Catholic you are forever marked, you will ALWAYS be Catholic even if you leave the Church, join another Church, or fall into a lifestyle of grave sin. You may not be in full communion in the Church, but once a Catholic always a Catholic.”

I agree with what you said. However, I think what Fr. Euteneuer meant was that Sean should not put himself forth as a Catholic in good standing. Also, he is not theologically Catholic. He is however, a Catholic like you say by his baptism.

I have to say, that I have used the same line Father has before. For example, I have said in the past: “so and so is no longer Catholic”. When I say this, I don’t mean it in the literal sense that their baptism into the Church is no longer valid. But that they are not Catholic any longer theologically. Just as you would say a Baptist who was born Catholic is “not Catholic”. We mean theologically.

Comment from admin
Time: March 12, 2007, 7:53 pm

Mike: thanks for the link and the information!!!

Comment from Paul Vincenti
Time: March 13, 2007, 2:33 am

Fr Tom is a modern day saint. He is a saint only because he does what is normal for a Christian and not becuase he does anything out of the ordinary. Correcting fellow Christians in love is vital as we will all be held accountable not only for what we say, but for also for what we do not say. Fr Tom corrects and if the nother feels judged by correction, the his problem is deeper than just being a rouge Catholic. We must pray for this man in great love for he is our dear brother also. Prayer will chnage his heart1 This is certain

Comment from Tina
Time: March 14, 2007, 8:54 am

Please everyone, pray that Sean wakes up, and allows the Holy Spirit to work in him. His attitude about the Church, and treatment of Father is extremely sad, and needs lots of prayer.

Comment from Tom
Time: March 15, 2007, 6:02 am

I finally got around to watching this “debate.” I used to work in the conservative movement, and while I still am a conservative, Sean rubs me the wrong way. He takes everything so personally and is like a pit bull and has no respect for other’s opinions. And Sean really doesn’t have as much respect as he thinks he does in the conservative movement.

His treatment of Fr. Tom is a disgrace. As a member of the Knights of Columbus, I am called to defend our faith and our priests. If Sean and I ever meet, my “Irish” would certainly be up that moment. He might want to think twice the next time he verbally attacks a priest.

My advice to Sean: save the rhetoric for anti-Catholics and anti-Christians, not our priests.

Comment from james
Time: March 18, 2007, 4:30 pm

Sean Hannity did a poor job. He was the host and did not allow the guest to answer his questions.
To Sean’s claim that he went to a seminary and studied Latin and Theology, I would say, “Sean, so did Joseph Stalin”.
We need to pray for Sean. If he is converted like Saul (later Paul), we have great hope for him and the Church he professes to be his.

Comment from leah
Time: March 19, 2007, 3:16 pm

The fundamentals of Logic and Argument are clearly lacking in Hannity’s speech. All I hear are logical fallacies. It’s embarassing that Hannity claims to be Catholic. It’s also embarassing that FOX even bothers to pretend they have “Catholic people” on their station.

Comment from Faciamus
Time: March 20, 2007, 5:29 am

Fr. Euteneuer is to be commended for standing up to Hannity on the truths of the Church on national television, it takes a man of courage and conviction to do such. Hannity proved that he has neither both in his response and his attitude toward the good Father. If only more Catholics would take a stand and ‘admonish the sinner’ when issues such as this arise.

Comment from Dan
Time: March 20, 2007, 9:21 am

Good Job Fr. Euteneuer!!!! I always find it amazing how amazed people are that someone might actually make them face the consequences of thier actions. I appreciate the fact that you actually love hannity and want to help his soul.

Comment from Hugh (Bart) Vincelette
Time: March 21, 2007, 5:06 am

A side issue , perhaps , but I’ve never watched the TV program in question but am aware of its controversial reputation. As a Canadian with a loyalty and affection for both the US and Canada , having lived in San Diego for many years; I deeply resent the denigration of Canada simply because our nation recognizes human dignity and the contributions to every area of human endeavour by loyal , law abiding , tax paying homosexual citizens. What is truly odious and immoral is to cling to ones rights while relentlessly attempting to diminish the rights of others. I am not aware of any piece of legislation from liberals or conservatives that undermines the Canadian family. Because ….there are none. AS for the TV program , it sounds like both the priest and the interviewer exercised free speech , even though at opposite end of the spectrum. And Fox has never been known for thoughtful commentators showing respect for anyone with an opposing point of view.

Comment from Paul
Time: March 21, 2007, 5:56 am

The good priest was not judging Hannity’s motives. He was not judging whether Hannity was going to hell. The priest was only judging Hannity’s actions. The were objectively wrong. They objectively were scandalous to the Church that Hannity says he belongs to. There is a difference between judging a person’s actions vs judging a person’s motives motives or salvation.

Hannity, more than anyone else, should understand it. He constantly makes that distinction on his show himself. He comes right out and say that those who oppose the war in Iraq are flat out wrong. But he makes it clear that he is not questioning their patriotism. So he judges them to be objectively wrong, but he does not judge their sincerity.

This is exactly what the priest did with Hannity. He attacked his action, not his sincerity. Hannity took it personal. And yet he is not shy to call someone else wrong and says it is not personal. He preaches that the priest should not judge. But this is an old ploy used by liberals. Liberals say that calling abortion murder is judging. How is that any different than Hannity’s response to the priest?

Comment from Giselle
Time: March 21, 2007, 7:27 am

As a long-time member of Regnum Christi myself, I tried to connect the dots on what I finally had to admit about the Movement I loved so much. I posted it here:

http://www.regainnetwork.org/article.php?a=47246005

Comment from TradCath
Time: March 21, 2007, 9:15 pm

Giselle, the link you gave did not work

Comment from Jeff
Time: April 16, 2007, 9:41 pm

Did anyone notice that Sean was noticeably upset? Listen carefully to his voice, how it is shaking. No Catholic layman, especially Americans, want to be corrected in public, particularly on national television. Sean knew he was wrong and his position indefensible; but he didn’t have the humility to admit it. Notice how he switched to an ad hominem attack against Father and the Catholic Church itself.

It was quite apparent to me that Sean’s intellect fully recognizes his own heresy. His will is what is standing in the way for his reconciliation.

This interview may be Sean’s wake up call. Pray for him.

Comment from Nick Nicosia
Time: April 24, 2007, 11:48 am

Sean Hannity is a Limbaugh lemming who’s logic is wrapped up the greater ‘greed’ rather than the greater good.

Like Goebels, when he can’t justify his position, he, and Limbaugh, and Goebels, label the dissenter with a Star of David or a cry of “unpatriotic.”

Pingback from Domus Dei » On “Judging” others
Time: July 30, 2007, 10:25 pm

[…] was the case back in March of this year in that much publicized and heated debate between the good Father Euteneuer and the apostate Sean Hannity. When Father Euteneuer confronted Mr. Hannity about his public support of artificial birth control, […]

Pingback from Reflections of a Paralytic » Sean Hannity and Contraception
Time: July 10, 2008, 7:58 am

[…] of the claims he makes are worth addressing. First is the question of judgment. On this I quote Domus Dei: When cornered all Hannity could do was resort to the tired old, “stop-judging-me” bit. He was […]

Write a comment